data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70a8b/70a8b2d3bdd635a2786b843db41487d7236fc3ee" alt="Nolan-Arenado-24323459"
The Boston Red Sox, one of Major League Baseball’s most storied franchises, have long been in the spotlight for their high-profile moves and roster decisions. Recently, speculation surrounding a possible trade that would send one of their young stars away in exchange for veteran third baseman Nolan Arenado has raised eyebrows. A prominent MLB insider has called such a move “organizational malpractice,” citing the long-term consequences it would have for the Red Sox’s future.
Before diving into the trade talk, it’s important to understand who the “young star” is in question. The Red Sox have several promising prospects in their system, but the player most frequently mentioned in trade rumors is Rafael Devers, the team’s 27-year-old third baseman. Devers has been one of the brightest stars in the Red Sox lineup over the past few years. In 2023, he posted an OPS of .926 with 38 home runs and 113 RBIs. His bat is elite, and his ability to drive the ball to all fields has made him one of the top hitters in baseball.
Devers has not only proven himself to be a key player for the Red Sox but also one of the cornerstones of the team’s future. His contract, which is team-friendly compared to some of the other massive contracts in baseball, gives the Red Sox a significant amount of financial flexibility. This is a rarity in the modern era of large, long-term contracts, and it makes Devers an even more valuable asset.
On the other side of the trade rumor is Nolan Arenado, a 33-year-old veteran third baseman with a reputation as one of the best defensive players in MLB history. Arenado has been a consistent offensive threat, batting .270 or higher in each of the last eight seasons and providing power with 30-plus home runs in most of those campaigns. But it is his defense that sets him apart, as he has earned multiple Gold Glove awards and is widely regarded as one of the best third basemen defensively in MLB history.
Arenado’s age, however, raises some concerns. While he remains productive at the plate, his defensive metrics have started to show slight signs of decline, and his contract (which runs through 2027) is a large financial commitment for a player who may soon be entering the twilight of his career. Trading for Arenado would certainly bolster the Red Sox’s lineup in the short term, but it would also tie up a significant portion of their payroll for the coming years.
While Arenado would undoubtedly provide some immediate value to the Red Sox, the idea of trading Rafael Devers to bring him in is problematic on multiple fronts. The first issue is the long-term ramifications. Devers is still in the prime of his career and has a much higher upside moving forward than Arenado. His offensive production alone makes him one of the most valuable players in the game, and his youth gives him the potential to remain an elite performer for years to come.
From an organizational perspective, trading away Devers would signal a short-term mindset for the Red Sox. While they may get immediate production from Arenado, they would lose a player who could anchor their lineup for the next decade. Building a championship-caliber team requires a balance of short-term success and long-term stability, and Devers offers just that. The Red Sox could use his bat as the centerpiece for their offense while building around him in other areas.
Additionally, trading Devers would also send a message to the fanbase: that the team is willing to part with a generational talent for a player who may only have a few more years of elite play left. In a market like Boston, where fans are passionate and expect a high level of performance year in and year out, such a move could create significant backlash. Red Sox fans have witnessed the team part with high-profile stars before, and they’ve seen how it can impact the team’s long-term competitiveness.
The MLB insider’s criticism of a potential Devers-for-Arenado trade as “organizational malpractice” is grounded in the fact that it would be a shortsighted decision that sacrifices the future of the team for immediate gain. The Red Sox are at a crossroads, and while adding a player like Arenado could make them a better team in the short term, they must not lose sight of the bigger picture. Devers represents the future of the franchise, and trading him away would be a mistake that could cost the Red Sox for years to come. Building around Devers, rather than trading him away, is the path to long-term success and sustained competitiveness.